🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the All England Club last four in the summer.

The American's play in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much effort to prevail. Down match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {